Discussion:
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-Chinese Imperial Family?
(too old to reply)
charlie vietcong
2011-04-14 06:26:59 UTC
Permalink
there was no sucj name as CHINA before the unification of
China,not
during the Chou ( Zhow ) Dynasty in 800 BC .


Before the Shang Salve Dynasty in 1700 BC , there was no
such a thing
as the Chinese people,
the Chinese people were originally known as the Hua people
and the Xia people , from two different tribes in around
Shangdong province
along the Yellow River .


look up the meaning of Hua and of Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
charlie vietcong
2011-04-14 06:37:35 UTC
Permalink
Shang dynasty was a slave owning dynasty .
there  was  no  sucj  name as  CHINA     before  the  unification  of
China,not
during  the  Chou (  Zhow )    Dynasty  in  800  BC .
Before  the  Shang  Salve  Dynasty  in 1700  BC   , there  was  no
such a  thing
 as  the  Chinese people,
 the  Chinese  people   were   originally  known as  the  Hua people
and  the  Xia  people ,  from  two  different  tribes  in  around
Shangdong  province
 along  the  Yellow  River .
look  up the  meaning of  Hua  and  of  Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
Siansiansian
2011-04-14 10:24:42 UTC
Permalink
Shang  dynasty  was  a  slave  owning  dynasty .
there  was  no  sucj  name as  CHINA     before  the  unification  of
China,not
during  the  Chou (  Zhow )    Dynasty  in  800  BC .
Before  the  Shang  Salve  Dynasty  in 1700  BC   , there  was  no
such a  thing
 as  the  Chinese people,
 the  Chinese  people   were   originally  known as  the  Hua people
and  the  Xia  people ,  from  two  different  tribes  in  around
Shangdong  province
 along  the  Yellow  River .
look  up the  meaning of  Hua  and  of  Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
There is no race called Chinese. It is a term used to described all
people under Qing Dynasty, namely Manchurian occupied territory, which
include Tibet, Xinjiang Mongolia, north-eastern and North-western
part under Russia nowadays.

And who care who is the Han Imperial Chinese? Most importantly, people
can live and enjoy life peacefully generation after generation.
Wakalukong
2011-04-14 10:35:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siansiansian
Shang  dynasty  was  a  slave  owning  dynasty .
there  was  no  sucj  name as  CHINA     before  the  unification  of
China,not
during  the  Chou (  Zhow )    Dynasty  in  800  BC .
Before  the  Shang  Salve  Dynasty  in 1700  BC   , there  was  no
such a  thing
 as  the  Chinese people,
 the  Chinese  people   were   originally  known as  the  Hua people
and  the  Xia  people ,  from  two  different  tribes  in  around
Shangdong  province
 along  the  Yellow  River .
look  up the  meaning of  Hua  and  of  Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
There is no race called Chinese. It is a term used to described all
people under Qing Dynasty, namely Manchurian occupied territory, which
include Tibet, Xinjiang Mongolia, north-eastern and North-western
part  under Russia nowadays.
And who care who is the Han Imperial Chinese? Most importantly, people
can live and enjoy life peacefully generation after generation.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------

Moron charlie vietconman Komin doesn't know that "Chinese" is an
English word.

Wakalukong
the LEARNGA Black Cock of the Indian Black Fucking Budha
2011-04-15 01:36:18 UTC
Permalink
SianSianSian ,


you have no proof that Tibet was a Manchurian occupied
territory .


you have no proof any Manchu general went into Tibet to
occupy Tibet .


the Manchu fought hard to occupy Hotan ,
at
the bottom of Tibetan Plateau .

you have no Manchu general actually occupied Lhasa , and the
whole
of the Tibetan Highland Plateau ,

SianSianSian is a Chinese , therefore Siansainsain is falsifying
Chinese history as usual .

no Manchu emperor has occupied Tibet .

You Chinese are just fantasizing your own theory on Tibet ,
just like you Chinese are fantasizing the history of the 3
kingdoms
which were all false,
the battles and the intrigues of the 3 kingdoms published
by Chinese .
companies were all false , were all fantasies invented by
Chinese story tellers .
Post by Siansiansian
Shang  dynasty  was  a  slave  owning  dynasty .
there  was  no  sucj  name as  CHINA     before  the  unification  of
China,not
during  the  Chou (  Zhow )    Dynasty  in  800  BC .
Before  the  Shang  Salve  Dynasty  in 1700  BC   , there  was  no
such a  thing
 as  the  Chinese people,
 the  Chinese  people   were   originally  known as  the  Hua people
and  the  Xia  people ,  from  two  different  tribes  in  around
Shangdong  province
 along  the  Yellow  River .
look  up the  meaning of  Hua  and  of  Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
There is no race called Chinese. It is a term used to described all
people under Qing Dynasty, namely Manchurian occupied territory, which
include Tibet, Xinjiang Mongolia, north-eastern and North-western
part  under Russia nowadays.
And who care who is the Han Imperial Chinese? Most importantly, people
can live and enjoy life peacefully generation after generation.
Alex
2011-04-15 02:05:52 UTC
Permalink
I am seeking revenge on Chinese writers to the press. See images in
http://www.kewkahfatt.9f.com/mylife/mylife1.html .

I cursed many people in my article
http://www.kewkahfatt.9f.com/election97.html .

***@yahoo.com.sg
***@hotmail.com
http://www.kewkahfatt.9f.com/index.html
http://members.multimania.co.uk/alexkew/index.html
http://kewkahfatt.blogspot.com/index.html


On Apr 15, 9:36 am, the LEARNGA Black Cock of the Indian Black
Post by the LEARNGA Black Cock of the Indian Black Fucking Budha
SianSianSian ,
you  have no  proof  that    Tibet  was  a  Manchurian  occupied
territory .
you  have  no  proof   any  Manchu  general  went  into  Tibet  to
occupy  Tibet .
the  Manchu  fought  hard  to  occupy  Hotan ,
at
the  bottom  of  Tibetan   Plateau .
you  have  no  Manchu  general  actually  occupied  Lhasa , and  the
whole
of  the  Tibetan  Highland Plateau ,
SianSianSian is a  Chinese , therefore  Siansainsain is falsifying
Chinese  history  as  usual  .
 no  Manchu emperor  has  occupied  Tibet .
You  Chinese  are  just  fantasizing  your  own  theory on Tibet ,
just   like  you  Chinese  are   fantasizing  the  history of  the  3
kingdoms
which were  all  false,
the  battles  and  the  intrigues  of  the  3 kingdoms   published
by  Chinese   .
companies  were  all  false ,  were  all  fantasies  invented  by
Chinese  story  tellers .
Post by Siansiansian
Shang  dynasty  was  a  slave  owning  dynasty .
there  was  no  sucj  name as  CHINA     before  the  unification  of
China,not
during  the  Chou (  Zhow )    Dynasty  in  800  BC .
Before  the  Shang  Salve  Dynasty  in 1700  BC   , there  was  no
such a  thing
 as  the  Chinese people,
 the  Chinese  people   were   originally  known as  the  Hua people
and  the  Xia  people ,  from  two  different  tribes  in  around
Shangdong  province
 along  the  Yellow  River .
look  up the  meaning of  Hua  and  of  Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
There is no race called Chinese. It is a term used to described all
people under Qing Dynasty, namely Manchurian occupied territory, which
include Tibet, Xinjiang Mongolia, north-eastern and North-western
part  under Russia nowadays.
And who care who is the Han Imperial Chinese? Most importantly, people
can live and enjoy life peacefully generation after generation.
AntiDabianchenVirus
2011-04-14 11:05:30 UTC
Permalink
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
In http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/1d1b73762f3c6ad2?hl=en
, you posted a thread asking if anyone knows "the history and
genealogy of China's present Han-Chinese Imperial Family".

35 minutes later, after rst9 took the trouble and responded, you
posted an answer to yourself: http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/ee33343d249c918c?hl=en
, stating everything you had asked. Are you the son of Komin, or is
this your idea of a joke? Or are you posting yet from another mental
institution?

On your profile:

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=69JA8REAAACHOOmCWzcxb7IScr8nvwo-kdEasx1kiYTQavV7mdW13Q

You had the gall to write that you are the "Official Emperor of China"
in exile. You must have forgotten to take those prescribed pills.
rst0wxyz
2011-04-14 15:27:33 UTC
Permalink
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
Inhttp://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/1d1b73762f3c6ad2...
, you posted a thread asking if anyone knows "the history and
genealogy of China's present Han-Chinese Imperial Family".
35 minutes later,  after rst9 took the trouble and responded, you
posted an answer to yourself:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/ee33343d249c918c...
, stating everything you had asked. Are you the son of Komin, or is
this your idea of a joke? Or are you posting yet from another mental
institution?
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=69JA8REAAACHOO...
You had the gall to write that you are the "Official Emperor of China"
in exile. You must have forgotten to take those prescribed pills.
Well, I see we are dealing with another mental case.
I know just the perfect place for him, More Rock Loco Mental Hospital
with abianchen/Meichi, the "guy from Tawang".
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...