Discussion:
Kovan double murder
(too old to reply)
The_Inquirer
2015-12-04 10:19:39 UTC
Permalink
http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/kovan-double-murder-iskandar-found-guilty-murder-both-victims-sentenced-hang

why the killing? why? warum?
--
The Inquirer

The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
ease
2015-12-04 15:53:36 UTC
Permalink
This guy deserves to go to the gallows. He murdered two men viciously and
relentlessly to conceal his acts.

If he goes to gallows, it shows he has nothing to lose anyway.

This is he is broke to the bone, and that was why he went to the house to
rob the dead men instead.

He is a divorcee and has no children, and he was investigated by the HR.

He was on verge of having to declare bankrupt and has to leave the police
job, if he cannot find the money to pay for the default of his loan.





"The_Inquirer" wrote in message news:n3rp7f$mf$***@dont-email.me...

http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/kovan-double-murder-iskandar-found-guilty-murder-both-victims-sentenced-hang

why the killing? why? warum?
--
The Inquirer

The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
The_Inquirer
2015-12-04 17:31:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by ease
This guy deserves to go to the gallows. He murdered two men viciously
and relentlessly to conceal his acts.
If he goes to gallows, it shows he has nothing to lose anyway.
This is he is broke to the bone, and that was why he went to the house
to rob the dead men instead.
He is a divorcee and has no children, and he was investigated by the HR.
He was on verge of having to declare bankrupt and has to leave the
police job, if he cannot find the money to pay for the default of his loan.
but why did he need to kill?
--
The Inquirer

The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
ease
2015-12-04 22:55:55 UTC
Permalink
A mistake to rob turned vicious to kill to eliminate his evidence
Post by ease
This guy deserves to go to the gallows. He murdered two men viciously
and relentlessly to conceal his acts.
If he goes to gallows, it shows he has nothing to lose anyway.
This is he is broke to the bone, and that was why he went to the house
to rob the dead men instead.
He is a divorcee and has no children, and he was investigated by the HR.
He was on verge of having to declare bankrupt and has to leave the
police job, if he cannot find the money to pay for the default of his loan.
but why did he need to kill?
--
The Inquirer

The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
Loading...